| Makes a good argument to me for the Trust to sell its shares to Levien on 22:29 - Aug 3 with 1488 views | SwansNZ |
JackSwan - don't bother reading any of that sh1t |  |
|  |
| Makes a good argument to me for the Trust to sell its shares to Levien on 22:33 - Aug 3 with 1462 views | morningstar |
This could either way here. This post could be the last, or it go on and on and on and...well you know what i mean! [Post edited 3 Aug 2016 22:34]
|  |
| |
| Makes a good argument to me for the Trust to sell its shares to Levien on 22:35 - Aug 3 with 1446 views | PTBaglanJack |
as if the yanks will fork out £30m for absolutely nothing, no benefit to them, as you say! |  | | |
| Makes a good argument to me for the Trust to sell its shares to Levien on 00:11 - Aug 4 with 1298 views | Kilkennyjack |
If the Trust sold and then saved the money for a rainy day, this makes some sense.
If the club hits financial hardship in future, and the Trust shares become worth zip, then the ability of the Trust to step in and help is all but gone.
If the Trust feels it has little influence now then the above option works.
Of course the Trust could sell to anyone they wanted to. [Post edited 4 Aug 2016 5:25]
|  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Makes a good argument to me for the Trust to sell its shares to Levien on 07:43 - Aug 4 with 1125 views | jack247 |
| Makes a good argument to me for the Trust to sell its shares to Levien on 22:35 - Aug 3 by PTBaglanJack |
as if the yanks will fork out £30m for absolutely nothing, no benefit to them, as you say! |
There would be an absolute benefit to them. They are here to increase the value of their stake and sell in a couple of years. If for arguments sake, their £100m investment becomes worth £150m, then by default they would have increased the trusts £30m to £45m? Whether they have the funds to do it is another thing.
Or am I missing something obvious? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.