Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
BBC... 22:44 - Dec 25 with 5879 viewsSwanzay

Why are the BBC calling people migrants and not refugees...?
0
BBC... on 21:31 - Dec 26 with 1409 viewsLohengrin

BBC... on 21:21 - Dec 26 by londonlisa2001

The King James is a beautiful piece of work.

I did, however, when I saw the story of the migrants yesterday, remark that many of those most vociferous in their opposition to these people arriving would also be the ones most vociferous in their celebration of the birth of a man who spent a lifetime explaining why the correct response would be one of welcome...


“Peace be within your walls and security within your towers!”

Psalms again, 122:7

An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.

-1
BBC... on 21:36 - Dec 26 with 1394 viewsexiledclaseboy

BBC... on 21:31 - Dec 26 by Lohengrin

“Peace be within your walls and security within your towers!”

Psalms again, 122:7


I bet you added the exclamation mark.

Poll: Tory leader

1
BBC... on 21:44 - Dec 26 with 1376 viewslondonlisa2001

BBC... on 21:31 - Dec 26 by Lohengrin

“Peace be within your walls and security within your towers!”

Psalms again, 122:7


As has been pointed out, that’s not a text which incorporates the teaching of the man being celebrated yesterday.

Since you like the King James, perhaps you should read Matthew 25 :

Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?

Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
0
BBC... on 21:47 - Dec 26 with 1372 viewsLohengrin

BBC... on 21:36 - Dec 26 by exiledclaseboy

I bet you added the exclamation mark.


I did. I hadn’t even realised until I read your post.

An inveterate dramatist. I’m sure old Billy Tyndale will be looking on from the great beyond and nodding approvingly.

An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.

-1
BBC... on 21:59 - Dec 26 with 1356 viewsLohengrin

BBC... on 21:44 - Dec 26 by londonlisa2001

As has been pointed out, that’s not a text which incorporates the teaching of the man being celebrated yesterday.

Since you like the King James, perhaps you should read Matthew 25 :

Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?

Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.


Matthew had never encountered Islam.

An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.

-1
BBC... on 22:18 - Dec 26 with 1340 viewsHighjack

BBC... on 21:25 - Dec 26 by dickythorpe

The 70's porn star King ding a king used to pass out every time he had more than a semi


Insert England football joke here

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Poll: Should Dippy Drakeford do us all a massive favour and just bog off?

1
BBC... on 22:31 - Dec 26 with 1329 viewsJack_Meoff

Answer to the OP, probably the same reason the term 'benefits' replaced social security. Deliberately framed to illicit a response, often subconscious.

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--forever.

1
BBC... on 09:39 - Dec 27 with 1248 viewsAnotherJohn

BBC... on 22:31 - Dec 26 by Jack_Meoff

Answer to the OP, probably the same reason the term 'benefits' replaced social security. Deliberately framed to illicit a response, often subconscious.


The term refugee has a legal meaning derived from Article 1 of the 1951 UN Refugee Convention:

[Being a person]
1(2) As a result of events […] and owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.
(I cut the bit that was amended by the 1967 Protocol).

Article 33 is the origin of the 'first safe country' rule, which so many have been trying to blur.

As regards the religious aspect, I can't help wondering whether Christians might learn something from Buddhists, who have more first-hand experience of what 'come' and 'inherit' may involve.

“Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world…”

See:
http://www.ebooksdownloads.xyz/search/islam-and-violent-separatism
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024