Forum | I've looked at it... by judd

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

I've looked at it... 19:20 - Feb 23 with 1690 views

judd

Now what's the fookin answer?

https://goo.gl/images/YRj27c

Poll:

What is it to be then?

I've looked at it... on 19:30 - Feb 23 with 1621 views

Cleedale

Dale to invite a baseball team to ground share?

Number 42. Missing number 4...therefore go 4-2-4?

42 - the number of non-playing backroom staff currently employed by RAFC?

I've looked at it... on 20:26 - Feb 23 with 1476 views

judd

I've looked at it... on 19:30 - Feb 23 by Cleedale
Dale to invite a baseball team to ground share? Number 42. Missing number 4...therefore go 4-2-4? 42 - the number of non-playing backroom staff currently employed by RAFC?

Thats more like it.

The beauty of spin in detracting the bullshit hungry from the real picture

Poll:

What is it to be then?

I've looked at it... on 08:58 - Feb 24 with 1195 views

regjenkins

I thought you were suggesting the player for left back?

' I started out with nothing and i still got most of it left'

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread