By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It did appear that Barlow may have picked up a slight knock as well - hopefully nothing of serious concern for either player.
Last night’s performance was exceptional and, for me, the most gratifying aspect was the display from the midfield duo, who dictated proceedings with authority throughout the full 90 minutes. In contrast to the previous two league fixtures, where we were perhaps a little sluggish in the opening phases, the intensity and control in the centre of the park were evident from the outset this time, even when having the ball played into them from the back (something that gave folk kittens last season).
Tactically, we’re not straying too far from the blueprint of last season. The key difference lies in the enhanced quality of personnel within the squad, which is allowing us to execute those familiar patterns with greater precision and consistency.
The patient build-up play, including lateral and backward passing, definitely remains a feature of our style - something I don’t mind in the slightest when it serves to dictate the tempo and probe for openings. Almost every goal kick in the second half was played short, for example. With the improved calibre of players, particularly in the No.9 role, we’re now far better equipped to capitalise on those moments when they arise.
Looking ahead to Saturday, Brackley could represent our first real test against a side likely to adopt a more defensive, perhaps even “park the bus” approach - though I hope that doesn’t unfairly undersell them. It will be intriguing to see how we go about unlocking that kind of opposition.
Encouraging signs all round - here’s hoping the momentum continues.
Firstly, we have won our first two games and I’m in optimistic mood. Just want to say that. It may change if results do, but, right now, things feel good.
Second, I’m surprised at the emphasis being placed on how the two new coaches were appointed, given that McNulty addressed this directly in his interview. He made it clear that he anticipated Gibbins’ departure and had a plan in place — that’s proactive, responsible management. Whether or not every detail was run past the board isn’t really the point. Managers are expected to lead, make key appointments, and shape the environment — it’s part of the job. Full public transparency on internal staffing processes isn’t standard practice, nor is it necessary in my view.
He explicitly said: “And, like others in other positions within my technical staff, I think about solutions and potential if these things should ever arise, and I knew what I wanted this summer.” That’s not someone reacting on the fly. That’s a manager with a plan.
He also said: “What mattered to me was their understanding – of us, of Rochdale, of what it means to play for this club.”
“I felt it was the right time to bring that alternative perspective in.”
“I thought it was good for us, and I’m really pleased with them both.”
This is clearly his decision, his strategy, and his rationale. He repeatedly uses “I” and “me” — no sign of anyone being imposed on him, no evidence of panic appointments.
The quotes make it clear: these were his decisions, aligned with his thinking, for the benefit of the club.
On the Cardiff comment, McNulty referring to them as a "Premier League club in stature" may have been enthusiastic language, but it’s pretty clear what he meant. He was talking about the scale and quality of their infrastructure.
Cardiff’s facilities and resources are well above the level they’re currently playing at. From a professional point of view, it’s understandable why someone would make that move, and McNulty was simply acknowledging that. It wasn’t a case of confusing their league status — it was a comment on the scale of the club off the pitch.
I watched the game and really enjoyed it. If we’re drawing comparisons to Dale, it was actually England that reminded me most of our play last season - lots of recycling possession, shifting the ball wide around the edge of the opposition box, then switching flanks in search of an opening, only to be met by a well-drilled defence. But, just like us at times last season, their persistence eventually paid off. I’m hoping with the new signings, it’ll pay off more often this season.
Cheers. I was familiar with the plans to refurb or even move away from Spotland, but I must have missed the announcement regarding the discontinuation of hospitality.
As I say, I feel it's a bit of an own goal, but the club will know best if it will ultimately be worth doing from a financial standpoint.
Your last line is precisely why I do it too. The fact that they’d really nailed the offering last season was a huge bonus. Two family members attended for the first time and were impressed with a desire to return for the same experience this season. I know there was an abundance of similar feedback from others who’d taken a package.
Personally, I think it’s a poor decision to cease it this season (that’s yet to be communicated) and I can’t imagine there are many clubs our size that don’t offer pre-match hospitality.
As to the new solution, that room is going to feel extremely cosy with anything approaching 200 people in too, which will not make for a great experience.
I’d be keen to hear the reasoning when the club decides to formally announce the decision.
I seem to remember something along the lines of a prize fund being £1,000,000. Now whether that was split equally between the 16 competing National League clubs (so £62,500 each), or if it was split based on progression in the competition etc, I’m not sure.
It’s been an absolute chore watching Lancs last season and this. Capitulation after capitulation with an insipid bowling attack. We are in real danger of finishing rock-bottom of division two at this rate.
It’s not all on Beneknstein, but you have to think a fresh approach from the coaching side of things has to be at least the first place to start.