| With Jenkins gone at last 10:26 - Feb 4 with 1556 views | swancity |
And good news it is what’s the latest with Dineen and Morgan in terms of their positions at Swansea City
And is Huw “I love Swansea City” Jenkins going to buy himself a season ticket now. If so would you want him to be sitting next to you  |  |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |  |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 10:31 - Feb 4 with 1507 views | N_T_J |
What would the consequences be if Huw broke his NDA agreement? |  | | |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 10:32 - Feb 4 with 1502 views | oldcob |
There's no honour among thieves, they'll probably see it as an opportunity for themselves. | | | |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 10:41 - Feb 4 with 1451 views | jacktar |
As he still owns a fairly substantial share holding, i would imagine he would be a non-paying guest of the club even if he is no longer on the board.  |  |
| We shouldn't all be tarred with the same brush you know! |
| |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 13:29 - Feb 4 with 1232 views | monmouth |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 10:41 - Feb 4 by jacktar |
As he still owns a fairly substantial share holding, i would imagine he would be a non-paying guest of the club even if he is no longer on the board. |
Why won’t he be on the Board? |  |
| |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 13:48 - Feb 4 with 1121 views | SomethingRandom |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 13:29 - Feb 4 by monmouth |
Why won’t he be on the Board? |
Because he only retains a minority shareholding. The majority shareholders can simply remove him. Just because he's a shareholder, it doesn't give him the right to sit on the board.
The question is, will Huw sell his remaining shares? | |
| |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 13:56 - Feb 4 with 1092 views | Jonathans_coat |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 13:29 - Feb 4 by monmouth |
Why won’t he be on the Board? |
I believe the policy is that anyone with less than 10% (or was it 5%) shareholding were not entitled to a a seat on the board anymore.
It was stated in the previous court case wasn’t it? |  | | |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 14:04 - Feb 4 with 1058 views | monmouth |
| With Jenkins gone at last on 13:56 - Feb 4 by Jonathans_coat |
I believe the policy is that anyone with less than 10% (or was it 5%) shareholding were not entitled to a a seat on the board anymore.
It was stated in the previous court case wasn’t it? |
I thought it was 5% if that hasn’t gone. Doesn’t he have 5%? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
