| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information 17:08 - Oct 17 with 3279 views | RAFCBLUE |
He's been at it again!
Not content over the Summer with outing the personal details, home addresses, email addresses and car registrations of Andrew Curran, Darrell Rose, Denise Valarie Courtnell, Faical Safouane and David Bottomley, Alexander Jarvis has been at it again, this time publicising his links with BBC journalist Simon Stone.
Before we get properly started on Jarvis' latest indiscetion, let's start with something in the public domain that hasn't been raised in the furore of last week - Simon Stone has been in trouble at the BBC before and their HR processes because of publishing racist material.
In March 2020 Simon Stone was hauled over the BBC for racism where he used a racist term in a tweet in an "uncensored racist insult"
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/bbc-presenter-forced-apologise-afte
As Andrew Curran would whisper in an TOWIE sort of way "He's got form" and this is not the first time that the BBC have, sadly, had to pull Simon Stone over to "have a word" about something he has written.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/howwework/policiesandguideli
The BBC has some pretty straightforward editorial standards and the link above is the BBC's code of conduct.
Section 1.6 (Slide 16 of 29) has the BBC's editorial values which are summarised as:
i. Trust
ii. Truth and accuracy
iii. Impartiality
iv. Editorial integrity and independence
v. Preventing harm and offence
vi. Serving the public interest
On the face of it the BBC's article last week, which have been taken down scored a big fat ZERO out of six.
Meanwhile, over in the darkness of his bedroom at his parent's house in leafy Birkenhead, Alexander Jarvis on the other hand still loves the sound of his own voice.
Having burned £1.2m of Morton House illicit funds in a tiny minority shareholding and at the same time bought only a full EFL disciplinary investigation into Morton House (that Alexander and his chums are trying to run away from), the Scouse Disaster is now trying damage limitation to try and somehow in the process save his skin from Andrew Curran and Darrell Rose who funded Morton House over the Summer.
Jarvis is the source of all of Simon Stone's "material" and persuaded a naive BBC journalist who should have known better to publish what anyone who has been following the story over six months a ridiculously incorrect article.
The club politely said the "article has several factual inaccuracies within it".
https://www.rochdaleafc.co.uk/news/2021/october/clubstatement_bbcarticle/
The Dale Trust more robustly published a detailed line by line deconstruction of the way in which the article was wrong.
https://www.daletrust.co.uk/2021/10/trust-response-to-bbc-article/
So how did Simon Stone get it so wrong?
One man. Alexander Jarvis.
"Jarvo" continues to think just emailing any old thing he might have historically from David Bottomley is still relevant and in date.
Jarvis has infamously dropped David Bottomley right in it when he emailed David Bottomley's confidential AGM presentation to a third party on 20th July 2021. The evidence on the file reported showed that the file had last been saved on 4th June 2021 at 15.10
https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/rochdale/forum/275265/alexander-jarvis-em
Bottomley was voted off the Board on 1st June at the EGM alongside Graham Rawlinson. Three days later (whilst not legally on the Board) Bottomley then emailed Alexander Jarvis chapter and verse on how to do a hostile takeover.
It still hasn't properly been explained how Alexander Jarvis got hold of that presentation when Jarvis WASN'T A SHAREHOLDER!
Ignoring the obvious data theft question, I'm beginning to think that Jarvis is to data protection what Inspector Clouseau was to policing.
Anyway, having been contacted by Alexander Jarvis and being given any information - leaked emails, leaked reports or the like, Simon Stone is supposed to check that information for those six things before he puts it out on the BBC Sport website:
i. Trust
ii. Truth and accuracy
iii. Impartiality
iv. Editorial integrity and independence
v. Preventing harm and offence
vi. Serving the public interest
Stone didn't do that. Far from it.
Stone said on Twitter he had contacted the club before the article was published. He clearly hadn't. Simon lied. We have the reply to the Dale fan who asked him.
Stone said on Twitter he had contacted the Dale Trust before the article was published. He clearly hadn't. Simon lied. We have the reply to the Dale fan who asked him.
And now the BBC's lawyers have taken that article down because it doesn't meet the required standards of factual accuracy or compliance with the BBC code of conduct.
I would expect that there is some form of HR investigation into the journalist concerned, particularly following his racist tweeting in 2020.
Unfortunately for Jarvis and Simon Stone, the BBC published it on 12 October and then edited it on 13 October. Copies of both BBC articles have been saved by various fans - it's criminal to think that we wouldn't save them as we saw them, such is the amount of material that has been generated over the last few months, this is just another two pages in the file.
https://www.similarweb.com/website/bbc.co.uk/#overview
The data says that globally the BBC website is the 66th most prolific website in the world. Inadvertently Rochdale has been slandered to millions of people around the world!
Simon Stone on the other hand is going to have to go and see the BBC HR department again to explain his actions. And then the BBC legal department to explain his actions.
I hope the club are taking this properly seriously and lining up lawyers to pursue both the BBC and the journalist for damages. The BBC do payout for making these types of factual errors as Harry and Meghan know.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/harry-and-meghan-accuse-bbc-of-libel-over-rep
It would be highly ironic if Jarvis' leaky email accounts generate the club some serious legal funds from a defamation claim against the BBC, particularly when the information published by the BBC was illegally obtained in the first place.
Rule 1 of journalism: Never publish something that isn't true.
|  |
| |  |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 17:20 - Oct 17 with 3220 views | James1980 |
This is priceless |  |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 17:42 - Oct 17 with 3161 views | RAFCBLUE |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 17:20 - Oct 17 by James1980 |
This is priceless |
Alexander Jarvis is priceless.
He has, single-handedly, manage to leak stuff at every opportunity.
He's not data secure given that he lists his various profiles in so many places that are publicly findable, for example.
https://rocketreach.co/alexander-jarvis-email_17593190
Let's just outline, this is ALL stuff in the public domain. You can check for yourself.
Step 1: Check is the email has been compromised via the below website: https://haveibeenpwned.com/
Step 2: Where is has, it tells you how and where it has been compromised.
So, if you use Alexander's old longstanding email of ajarvis@blackbridgecrossborders.com (used in various deals, including the Southampton FC deal), the website will tell you that it was breached:
1) In October 2019, from a Data Enrichment Exposure
2) In February 2014, from the Forbes website
3) In February 2018, from MyFitnessPal
4) In September 2019, from game developer Zyanga
The compromised data is summarised as:
* Email addresses,
* Employers,
* Geographic locations, Job titles,
* Names,
* Phone numbers,
* Social media profiles
* IP addresses
To be honest, I'm not sure I'm more suprised where Alexander's personal data is found - MyFitnesspal and Zyanga or Forbes! | |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 19:15 - Oct 17 with 2837 views | judd |
Jarvo threatening legal action on Twitter now. Claims he doesn't know the journo. Erm... |  |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 19:31 - Oct 17 with 2761 views | UpTheDaleNotForSale |
We knew Mr Jarvis blocked a LOT of dale fans on twitter over the last couple of weeks, but tonight he has allegedly threatened some with legal action in their DMs before blocking them.
As Judd has mentioned, Mr Jarvis has claimed on twitter tonight to not know the journalist. |  |
| Twitter : @DaleNotForSale
Facebook : facebook.com/upthedalenotforsale |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 19:35 - Oct 17 with 2750 views | kel |
Poor Jarvo. The heat seems to be getting to him doesn’t it? |  |
| “He was deliberately misleading the EFL” |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 19:36 - Oct 17 with 2741 views | RAFCBLUE |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 19:15 - Oct 17 by judd |
Jarvo threatening legal action on Twitter now. Claims he doesn't know the journo. Erm... |
Would love to see him on the stand in the witness box in a libel trial.
It would ruin him and those who helped him in June after the EGM.
His Twitter password was compromised too btw, which is why he’s had to protect his tweets. | |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 20:15 - Oct 17 with 2604 views | James1980 |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 19:36 - Oct 17 by RAFCBLUE |
Would love to see him on the stand in the witness box in a libel trial.
It would ruin him and those who helped him in June after the EGM.
His Twitter password was compromised too btw, which is why he’s had to protect his tweets. |
I'm hazarding a guess you are confident UTDNFS would win any libel case young Alexander The Grate might want to pursue. | |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 20:23 - Oct 17 with 2571 views | DorkingDale |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 19:36 - Oct 17 by RAFCBLUE |
Would love to see him on the stand in the witness box in a libel trial.
It would ruin him and those who helped him in June after the EGM.
His Twitter password was compromised too btw, which is why he’s had to protect his tweets. |
This is absolutely priceless - well done RAFC & co | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 20:28 - Oct 17 with 2536 views | D_Alien |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 20:15 - Oct 17 by James1980 |
I'm hazarding a guess you are confident UTDNFS would win any libel case young Alexander The Grate might want to pursue. |
"Alexander the Grate"
That too, is priceless James! |  |
| |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 21:19 - Oct 17 with 2382 views | RAFCBLUE |
| MORTON HOUSE / Leaky Alexander Jarvis emails Simon Stone LOTS of information on 20:15 - Oct 17 by James1980 |
I'm hazarding a guess you are confident UTDNFS would win any libel case young Alexander The Grate might want to pursue. |
https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/rochdale/forum/275265/alexander-jarvis-em
We can start with this, Alexander.
1) How on earth did you get your hands on the confidential shareholder presentation from David Bottomley AFTER it was saved on 4th June 2021, 72 hours after David Bottomley was removed from the RAFC Board on a shareholder vote?
2) How many emails did you receive from David Bottomley’s RAFC email account AFTER the EGM which removed him on 1st June, so from 2nd June onwards.
3) On what legal basis did you receive those emails from 2nd June onwards given that Board of Directors that night WITHDREW (of their own choosing) the motions around share capital.
4) Did you forward another of those emails received to anyone, on what dates and for what purposes? You can’t possibly deny you did because the above link noting your email leaked above (link above) shows that you did it.
If Alexander was to attempt to sue the poster (DaleEamonn) for libel then he’d lose. As would David Bottomley because Alexander had Bottomley’s presentation and someone would have to explain to the court why it had been leaked.
And that’s because Alexander Jarvis LEAKS.
I wouldn’t trust Jarvis with my shopping list because it would turn up on the web somewhere; as various parties that he has represented will attest.
Jarvis has singlehandedly scuppered Morton House at every turn. Jarvis is the reason that Southall’s name was leaked to the MEN.
Jarvis is the reason the BBC have a problem because of Simon Stone | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
