By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
This is a písser too: Located in the Sir Trevor Brooking Stand, rail seating has been implemented in the away section of the upper tier. West Ham have instructed us to sell this in a strict selling order, and blocks will only open to purchase once a block has sold out. Therefore, the upper tier will not be open for sales until the lower tier has sold out.
Get them early, you're sitting low. I'll be on a train coming back from a work trip, so I won't be able to make it
Junior members of staff at the Saints recently told an independent disciplinary commission that head coach Tonda Eckert put them "under extreme pressure" to secretly spy on other sides.
The club has been punished, but he's still there, still being paid, and seems to have been central to it. Throw the book at him.
And that's why the appeal will succeed; because repeated, slowed down, close up footage of the incident shows he took the ball which rebounded off the PNE player's shin, and the collision afterwards that made it look worse.
The ref got that wrong and wasn't helped by the yellow flag assistant. He shirked any responsibility and left it to the ref to cop it. Both the ref and assistant's first game with us - I doubt they'll get another soon.
The club will appeal and it will be turned over. Clubs can appeal a red card on two specific grounds: wrongful dismissal or mistaken identity. It's obviously not mistaken identity, so the criteria of wrongful dismissal apply.
For wrongful dismissal the club must prove that the referee made an obvious error in issuing a straight red card (e.g., for serious foul play or violent conduct).
We can't appeal on the basis the decision was strict but that he made an error. We have to provide undeniable proof, and we can use TV and broadcast media to show it.
Serious foul play is defined as: A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play.
In this instance, if we can prove that he took the ball first and was taking the ball and not the player, it would likely be deemed an obvious error by the ref.
I've seen two videos from different angles and they're clear; he got the ball first, was targeting the ball, not the man, and wasn't using excessive force.
Memories do fade, but a simple Google search for “United 93” would have brought up the flight, the history and the award-winning film about the flight.
Nobody needs to remember the flight numbers of all four planes. They do, however, need to check what they’re about to print on clothing and sell. An honest mistake can still be an avoidable one.
of what happens when marketing isn't connected to the rest of the organisation, society and the real world.
A football club has apologised after it published images of a new clothing line with "United 93" printed on the back - the call sign of one of the aircraft hijacked on 9/11.
JnrJnr went to the Orient v Bradford game, and I asked him how Morgan did. Very meh, lost the ball a bit, one or two decent passes, but not great. In a poor quality game between two poorer teams, he said the difference in quality between how we play was stark. In that circumstance, you'd expect Morgan to stand out, and he did, but for the wrong reasons.
I checked his stats, and he was rated the lowest of the Bradford starters, only 36 touches, zero tackles, 1 interception, 2 fouls.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
