| Brendan Rodgers 13:33 - Dec 30 with 11536 views | premierjack |
Apparently we are in negotiations with him and Liverpool to try and sort a deal out. If he becomes our manager it will effect his pay form then so a deal is trying to be made!
Not sure how I feel about it... Wonder if he could bring any Liverpool players with him to help us this season |  | | |  |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:35 - Dec 30 with 6732 views | Oldjack |
Our Joe would be a good start |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:37 - Dec 30 with 6700 views | Loyal |
I'm not sure why we don't employ him and then let him sort it out, they get paid enough.
I also know that it is illegal to restrain someone's trade by contract so this story of negotiations with Liverpool sounds off the mark. |  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:39 - Dec 30 with 6662 views | MrSwerve |
I'm sick of all of these 'apparently' and 'I've heard that' threads about potential managers. State your source or don't bother. |  |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:42 - Dec 30 with 6636 views | AngelRangelQS |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:37 - Dec 30 by Loyal |
I'm not sure why we don't employ him and then let him sort it out, they get paid enough.
I also know that it is illegal to restrain someone's trade by contract so this story of negotiations with Liverpool sounds off the mark. |
Restrictive covenants are very common and if this is true Brendan would have signed his agreement to it when he took over or signed his last contract there.
Liverpool are reasonably protecting their interests |  | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:48 - Dec 30 with 6564 views | premierjack |
Liverpool have to pay him until the end of the season so he won't sign anything with us because his payments from them will stop, not sure how much but I'm assuming he was a a decent wage! | | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:48 - Dec 30 with 6553 views | TheFranchise |
If he can bring Joe home, it'd be worth it. It's shown recently that Leon is vital to our tempo and Joe learnt from the master. |  | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:49 - Dec 30 with 6543 views | Loyal |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:42 - Dec 30 by AngelRangelQS |
Restrictive covenants are very common and if this is true Brendan would have signed his agreement to it when he took over or signed his last contract there.
Liverpool are reasonably protecting their interests |
These contractual matters have never been appropriately challenged IMO.
I'm not sure who they are protecting after sacking him, any legal person representing BR would have amended that part as they have nothing to protect after sacking him. I get it if he was headhunted by another club, but sacking him would null and void this part ? | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:51 - Dec 30 with 6519 views | TheFranchise |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:49 - Dec 30 by Loyal |
These contractual matters have never been appropriately challenged IMO.
I'm not sure who they are protecting after sacking him, any legal person representing BR would have amended that part as they have nothing to protect after sacking him. I get it if he was headhunted by another club, but sacking him would null and void this part ? |
He's probably still getting paid more than what we can offer. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:54 - Dec 30 with 6487 views | jojaca |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:49 - Dec 30 by Loyal |
These contractual matters have never been appropriately challenged IMO.
I'm not sure who they are protecting after sacking him, any legal person representing BR would have amended that part as they have nothing to protect after sacking him. I get it if he was headhunted by another club, but sacking him would null and void this part ? |
According do my sources, I am having curry for tea. |  |
| Even when you know, you never know? |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:56 - Dec 30 with 6450 views | pencoedjack |
I hope to fuk we don't have Rodgers back. |  | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:56 - Dec 30 with 6438 views | Loyal |
This all smells rather fishy, which isn't my favourite curry.
BTW if correctly stored today is the last day to use up your Xmas day turkey leftovers - that is if you don't want to die in a scene of mass bottom spurting and diaroeha the colour of our away kit 1997. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:57 - Dec 30 with 6425 views | AngelRangelQS |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:49 - Dec 30 by Loyal |
These contractual matters have never been appropriately challenged IMO.
I'm not sure who they are protecting after sacking him, any legal person representing BR would have amended that part as they have nothing to protect after sacking him. I get it if he was headhunted by another club, but sacking him would null and void this part ? |
They have been challenged and found to be fine providing they are reasonable.
I suppose they will be protecting things like transfer targets, a potential 3 or 6 points against his new team (tactical knowledge, set piece knowledge etc), poaching staff, maybe relationships with external scouts or agents.
It also continues beyond the end of the contract. Certainly won't be an issue between 3-6 months and probably not up to 12 either.
If he is headhunted then compensation is payable which I assume covers buying the manager out of the covenants as they can be varied by agreement. | | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:59 - Dec 30 with 6406 views | snork44 |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:56 - Dec 30 by pencoedjack |
I hope to fuk we don't have Rodgers back. |
If we get get Brendan if will be an outstanding piece of business !! |  |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:06 - Dec 30 with 6343 views | Jack_Jackson |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:59 - Dec 30 by snork44 |
If we get get Brendan if will be an outstanding piece of business !! |
So if we pay Liverpool £10m for Brendan that will be an "outstanding piece of business !!" ? |  |
| If Carlsberg made Swans fans... |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:11 - Dec 30 with 6289 views | Tom1912 |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:06 - Dec 30 by Jack_Jackson |
So if we pay Liverpool £10m for Brendan that will be an "outstanding piece of business !!" ? |
Er of course not, but that's not going to happen | | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:13 - Dec 30 with 6263 views | perchrockjack |
So ,after interviewing a variety of candidates ,the best option is a former manager.
NOT GOOD REALLY ,IS IT | |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:14 - Dec 30 with 6250 views | acejack3065 |
I'm sorry but I just can't see this happening anytime soon. He's not coming back. |  | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:18 - Dec 30 with 6217 views | TheFranchise |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:13 - Dec 30 by perchrockjack |
So ,after interviewing a variety of candidates ,the best option is a former manager.
NOT GOOD REALLY ,IS IT |
What if he is the best option though? Would we go for someone worse just because we want to avoid an ex manager? | | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:20 - Dec 30 with 6200 views | MattG |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:13 - Dec 30 by perchrockjack |
So ,after interviewing a variety of candidates ,the best option is a former manager.
NOT GOOD REALLY ,IS IT |
Surely if he's the BEST option then it actually IS good, no?
No idea who has been approached / interviewed nor any of the reasons why (or even if) they turned us down (or vice versa) but still complaining. Sheesh. |  | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:25 - Dec 30 with 6144 views | premierjack |
| Brendan Rodgers on 13:57 - Dec 30 by AngelRangelQS |
They have been challenged and found to be fine providing they are reasonable.
I suppose they will be protecting things like transfer targets, a potential 3 or 6 points against his new team (tactical knowledge, set piece knowledge etc), poaching staff, maybe relationships with external scouts or agents.
It also continues beyond the end of the contract. Certainly won't be an issue between 3-6 months and probably not up to 12 either.
If he is headhunted then compensation is payable which I assume covers buying the manager out of the covenants as they can be varied by agreement. |
I don't think Liverpool are protecting themselves or stop him working, BR is free to go wherever he wants BUT his Liverpool wages will stop and he obviously doesn't want that | | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:36 - Dec 30 with 6060 views | Dyfnant |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:25 - Dec 30 by premierjack |
I don't think Liverpool are protecting themselves or stop him working, BR is free to go wherever he wants BUT his Liverpool wages will stop and he obviously doesn't want that |
He will likely be receiving his normal wage monthly from Liverpool at the moment. Liverpool will be obliged to make up any shortfall in any deal we offer him. Any bonuses due from them will be a different matter |  |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:39 - Dec 30 with 6011 views | perchrockjack |
MATT
My view is its never good to go back in life. We did it with Tosh and ended in tears.
CURT has said himself we need something different. Rodgers isn't.
sheesh | |
| |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:47 - Dec 30 with 5958 views | AngelRangelQS |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:39 - Dec 30 by perchrockjack |
MATT
My view is its never good to go back in life. We did it with Tosh and ended in tears.
CURT has said himself we need something different. Rodgers isn't.
sheesh |
There are a lot of examples of managers who have gone back and done well.
Personally I think Rodgers is the best and least risky candidate of the lot | | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:54 - Dec 30 with 5895 views | MattG |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:39 - Dec 30 by perchrockjack |
MATT
My view is its never good to go back in life. We did it with Tosh and ended in tears.
CURT has said himself we need something different. Rodgers isn't.
sheesh |
Rodgers is someone different from Curtis, Monk and Laudrup. However, he knows the Club and some of the players which gives him a head start. Any manager would be a gamble but I would say that this one has better odds than many of the others.
Who, of those potentially still in the frame, would you suggest represents a safer bet than Rodgers? | | | |
| Brendan Rodgers on 14:59 - Dec 30 with 5847 views | Thornburyswan |
Personally I'd be up for Bren coming in to work with Curt until the end of the season as it would, by far, be the least disruptive option - all parties could then review their positions based on how things turn out & any other options all parties have.
Might just suit everyone & with Rodgers Chelsea & Liverpool links might just get us a player or two on loan e.g. Remy, Bamford, Ibe, Origi etc | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
