By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It's an affirmative from me but I'll be looking for them to double up on the old cod liver oil, glucosamine suppositories, eye of newt liqueur, leech therapy and whatever other white magic can keep them available for an actual season.
1
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:21 - Jul 4 with 7161 views
If we sign both it does feel like we’ll be very top heavy when it comes to defence and central midfield.
Saving grace is the timing of this. Both players’ agents will have tested the market, and I would strongly wager they’ll be on significantly less this coming season than last as the leverage is with us. They’d have gone elsewhere if the demand had existed.
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 22:32 - Jul 4 with 7104 views
IIRC Rangel was offered a contract back when the rest of the old wood had been let go. He just hadn't agreed terms I guess. Cameron could get peanuts in MLS, maybe we added a bit of salt to make him stay. Neither of them are a total waste of space, either on or off the pitch.
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 04:46 - Jul 5 by VancouverHoop
IIRC Rangel was offered a contract back when the rest of the old wood had been let go. He just hadn't agreed terms I guess. Cameron could get peanuts in MLS, maybe we added a bit of salt to make him stay. Neither of them are a total waste of space, either on or off the pitch.
'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!'
2
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 with 6540 views
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 08:07 - Jul 5 by Northernr
If we sign Cameron then that Ball transfer looks weirder than it already does.
A bit like Gobern a few years ago....
Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.
Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R
A bit like Gobern a few years ago....
Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.
Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.
4231 would still be my choice.
I think it'll be his choice as well.
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:22 - Jul 5 with 6353 views
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R
A bit like Gobern a few years ago....
Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.
Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.
4231 would still be my choice.
gobern haha, thank you for the reminder... i think he played about 20 minutes in a meaningless efl cup match against yeovil
we really have signed some random players
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:29 - Jul 5 with 6314 views
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R
A bit like Gobern a few years ago....
Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.
Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.
4231 would still be my choice.
given Hall's injury record it's more like 4 and a half centre halves but know what you mean
Cameron coming in seems an odd one
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:33 - Jul 5 with 6286 views
Let the manager and DOF do their jobs and we can pick the bones out of it come January. We rarely call it right as fans when the club recruits players.
3
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:44 - Jul 5 with 6239 views
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 09:04 - Jul 5 by Gloucs_R
A bit like Gobern a few years ago....
Just feel like we are getting a really bloated squad again. At RB we would have Furlong, Rangel and Kakay. No need for Furlong to go centre now as we have 5 CB's.
Is Warburton a 532 manager? I keep looking at the squad thinking where does everyone fit in.
4231 would still be my choice.
I’d say Kakay might go out on loan. Remember Cousins and Pav were utilised there a few times last season and they’ve gone. As for centre backs they’re definitely needed. Some of the signings like Masterson probably won’t be first choice from the off. Most likely won’t get more than 10-15 games out of Hall. We need these players. Only question mark is will they be good enough.
Depending on wages I'd be happy with both. By all accounts Rangel is a thoroughly good character to have around the club. Expect him to play second fiddle to Furlong. We usually looked better last year with Cameron in the side. And he offers a physical presence in a midfield full of midgets. Both would bring experience to an otherwise very young squad.
The first sentence is the most important but I'd trust MW, Sir Les and Hoos to get this right.
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain)
Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky
1
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 10:54 - Jul 5 with 6193 views
Subs Kelly, Amos, Ball, Rangel, Shodipo, Smith + a striker (although not sure if its only the Prem that allow 7 now?)
Think I would disagree with this line-up. I think Smith and Amos will be first choice. Also believe that Kelly will be number 1 before Lumley. In fact wouldn't be that surprised to see Lumley go as the (apparently) highly-rated Dieng has signed a new contract - to be 3rd choice?
We have lost/losing 8-11 players - Freeman, (Luongo prob), Ingram, Lynch, Bidwell, Pavel, Smith, Baptiste, Cousins, and two loanees, so need quite a few though Cameron is a bit of a strange one.
0
CAMERON?! AND RANGEL?! on 11:14 - Jul 5 with 6102 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
