| What do we still need? 14:04 - Sep 12 with 6836 views | TomRAFC |
The obvious gaps for me are a left back and another out and out striker. Preferably a left back who can get forward in the same way to McLaughlin and an experienced physical presence kind of striker. Some Newby/Baah/Done can run off.
Who's out there/who would you realistically like to see signed up? |  |
| |  |
| What do we still need? on 14:07 - Sep 12 with 5614 views | funkkk |
I can see us going for a young loanee striker though I'd rather see us getting an experienced target man. |  | | |
| What do we still need? on 14:12 - Sep 12 with 5575 views | boromat |
In order of priority
1) First choice left back
2) An experienced striker to fill out the squad.
3) Competition up top probably a loanee. Someone with pace who can play centrally or down the flanks.
4) Maybe another midfielder. I'm starting to get a bit nervous with Rathbone having interest in him and Lund and Ryan struggling to be fit already think one more might be a good idea if possible. | |
| |
| What do we still need? on 14:14 - Sep 12 with 5563 views | kel |
Someone on here was quite adamant we’d signed a striker on loan from Man U so that’s that boxed off. |  | | |
| What do we still need? on 14:16 - Sep 12 with 5533 views | TVOS1907 |
| What do we still need? on 14:14 - Sep 12 by kel |
Someone on here was quite adamant we’d signed a striker on loan from Man U so that’s that boxed off. |
More like we're signing Adam Ant! |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| What do we still need? on 14:17 - Sep 12 with 5534 views | isitme |
| What do we still need? on 14:14 - Sep 12 by kel |
Someone on here was quite adamant we’d signed a striker on loan from Man U so that’s that boxed off. |
I must have missed the announcement. Was it supposed to be happening last week? |  | | |
| What do we still need? on 14:18 - Sep 12 with 5509 views | D_Alien |
| What do we still need? on 14:17 - Sep 12 by isitme |
I must have missed the announcement. Was it supposed to be happening last week? |
It'll happen all of a Sudden |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| What do we still need? on 14:24 - Sep 12 with 5428 views | judd |
Mere semantics, luv.
I doubt the MEN got their info off of here neither |  |
| |
| What do we still need? on 14:26 - Sep 12 with 5414 views | kel |
| What do we still need? on 14:24 - Sep 12 by judd |
Mere semantics, luv.
I doubt the MEN got their info off of here neither |
Indeed. I was just quoting what was posted. | | | |
| What do we still need? on 14:30 - Sep 12 with 5383 views | judd |
| What do we still need? on 14:26 - Sep 12 by kel |
Indeed. I was just quoting what was posted. |
Fair enough.
We still need another couple of decent players to fall into our laps | |
| |
| What do we still need? on 14:31 - Sep 12 with 5377 views | boromat |
Wants a 5 figure weekly sum 🤣 | |
| |
| What do we still need? on 14:33 - Sep 12 with 5361 views | judd |
| What do we still need? on 14:31 - Sep 12 by boromat |
Wants a 5 figure weekly sum 🤣 |
A nearly 5 figure.
He's clearly deluded | |
| |
| What do we still need? on 14:37 - Sep 12 with 5328 views | isitme |
A first choice left back and an experienced central striker are essential. Outside of that a few loan signings who can play in midfield or forward areas would be nice. | | | |
| What do we still need? on 14:38 - Sep 12 with 5316 views | TVOS1907 |
| What do we still need? on 14:31 - Sep 12 by boromat |
Wants a 5 figure weekly sum 🤣 |
£999.99 | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| What do we still need? on 15:23 - Sep 12 with 5239 views | electricblue |
Left Back.
Centre Back.(even though dale signed Amankwah)
Striker..... [Post edited 12 Sep 2020 15:24]
|  |
| My all time favourite Dale player Mr Lyndon Symmonds |
| |
| What do we still need? on 10:40 - Sep 13 with 4972 views | oddjob007 |
| What do we still need? on 14:33 - Sep 12 by judd |
A nearly 5 figure.
He's clearly deluded |
Not someone I’d particularly want at our football club tbh.
Good luck to the lad who is clearly looking for £4/£500k a year, at 17 and not exactly being touted as a superstar of the future (I’m sure Greenwood is the same age?)
MU are one of the richest clubs in the world and he’s deemed them not good enough for himself, you wonder what kind of people get in these kid’s heads. [Post edited 13 Sep 2020 10:41]
| | | |
| What do we still need? on 11:40 - Sep 13 with 4887 views | D_Alien |
| What do we still need? on 10:40 - Sep 13 by oddjob007 |
Not someone I’d particularly want at our football club tbh.
Good luck to the lad who is clearly looking for £4/£500k a year, at 17 and not exactly being touted as a superstar of the future (I’m sure Greenwood is the same age?)
MU are one of the richest clubs in the world and he’s deemed them not good enough for himself, you wonder what kind of people get in these kid’s heads. [Post edited 13 Sep 2020 10:41]
|
It's the nitrous oxide wot dunnit
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54136699
[Post edited 13 Sep 2020 11:50]
| |
| |
| What do we still need? on 12:01 - Sep 13 with 4852 views | foreverhopefulDale |
Good to see that so called newspaper supporting our young footballers by bringing up stories of mistakes made when they were younger, that have no bearing on their current careers. Yes he and Foden were stupid in what they did, however it won’t do any of them any good to have so called newspapers trawling round their past and highlighting their minor mistakes. How about highlighting all of their accomplishments? |  |
| |
| What do we still need? on 12:07 - Sep 13 with 4821 views | D_Alien |
| What do we still need? on 12:01 - Sep 13 by foreverhopefulDale |
Good to see that so called newspaper supporting our young footballers by bringing up stories of mistakes made when they were younger, that have no bearing on their current careers. Yes he and Foden were stupid in what they did, however it won’t do any of them any good to have so called newspapers trawling round their past and highlighting their minor mistakes. How about highlighting all of their accomplishments? |
I'm sure their accomplishments get a pretty decent airing fhD
Fwiw, i've never believed footballers should be treated as role models, they're just ordinary human beings with a particular skill and too much money to spend | |
| |
| What do we still need? on 12:10 - Sep 13 with 4814 views | richfoad32 |
| What do we still need? on 12:01 - Sep 13 by foreverhopefulDale |
Good to see that so called newspaper supporting our young footballers by bringing up stories of mistakes made when they were younger, that have no bearing on their current careers. Yes he and Foden were stupid in what they did, however it won’t do any of them any good to have so called newspapers trawling round their past and highlighting their minor mistakes. How about highlighting all of their accomplishments? |
It's on BBC Sport, not a newspaper? Agree though, I never read tabloids they are absolute scum.
EDIT: Just seen they took the story from The Sun, that explains everything. [Post edited 13 Sep 2020 12:13]
| | | |
| What do we still need? on 12:33 - Sep 13 with 4753 views | foreverhopefulDale |
| What do we still need? on 12:07 - Sep 13 by D_Alien |
I'm sure their accomplishments get a pretty decent airing fhD
Fwiw, i've never believed footballers should be treated as role models, they're just ordinary human beings with a particular skill and too much money to spend |
You are right in the role model thing. I just get sick of the hypocrisy of these so called newspapers, who claim to be patriotic, but find ways of undermining our sport-stars. Yes report the facts about current misdemeanours but please don’t trawl past history about very minor misdemeanours that have no bearing on whether they will do well for our national team. Let’s find out about the misdemeanours of these reporters after all they will have a completely spotless past, won’t they? | |
| |
| What do we still need? on 14:34 - Sep 13 with 4599 views | Ancoats_Blue |
Someone posted a perhaps tongue in cheek request for Joe Garner at Wigan. He’d certainly do a job in this league, fits the experienced and proven goal scorer remit and with Wigan in the state they’re in I can see him moving on. We probably can’t meet his wage demands though so a non starter.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see Bunney back as he can fill both LB and forward gaps when required. Wilbraham returning also wouldn’t surprise me. |  | | |
| What do we still need? on 15:00 - Sep 13 with 4549 views | rochdaleriddler |
| What do we still need? on 14:34 - Sep 13 by Ancoats_Blue |
Someone posted a perhaps tongue in cheek request for Joe Garner at Wigan. He’d certainly do a job in this league, fits the experienced and proven goal scorer remit and with Wigan in the state they’re in I can see him moving on. We probably can’t meet his wage demands though so a non starter.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see Bunney back as he can fill both LB and forward gaps when required. Wilbraham returning also wouldn’t surprise me. |
Bunney isn’t good enough, and Wilbraham is too old. I’d like to see neither |  |
| |
| What do we still need? on 15:52 - Sep 13 with 4481 views | Ancoats_Blue |
| What do we still need? on 15:00 - Sep 13 by rochdaleriddler |
Bunney isn’t good enough, and Wilbraham is too old. I’d like to see neither |
As a back up I think Wilbraham could be OK for one more season. He seems quite fit (ooer). But unless Baah or Tavares start holding down regular starts and scoring we need more than that. I’m just hoping if/when Bunney reappears it’s the Bunney that seemed to he involved in every other chance we had for about 15 games a few years ago. Maybe not though... | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
