| Armstrong Departs on 19:08 - Jul 8 with 2156 views | Yorkshire_Dale | No disrespect to the lad but this is probably best for both parties...don't think he would figure at San Spotty very much, with all the new arrivals and he surely would like a permanent deal elsewhere. Good luck. |  | |  |
| Armstrong Departs on 19:56 - Jul 8 with 2007 views | EllDale | Always sad when a young player leaves but I’m not sure why he got a two year deal 12 months ago. Obviously seen as the potential understudy to Beckwith at the time. Half thought he might have ended up at Halifax under their new manager due to the Kings Lynn connection. Good luck to the lad. |  | |  |
| Armstrong Departs on 20:10 - Jul 8 with 1983 views | TVOS1907 |
| Armstrong Departs on 19:56 - Jul 8 by EllDale | Always sad when a young player leaves but I’m not sure why he got a two year deal 12 months ago. Obviously seen as the potential understudy to Beckwith at the time. Half thought he might have ended up at Halifax under their new manager due to the Kings Lynn connection. Good luck to the lad. |
Signed by "Soft Lad" instead.... |  |
| You mean you STILL haven't worked out why some posts get down-ticked? |
|  |
| Armstrong Departs on 20:49 - Jul 8 with 1884 views | EllDale | Oh, I didn’t know he was there! The Liverpool connection then. |  | |  |
| Armstrong Departs on 07:41 - Jul 9 with 1338 views | TVOS1907 |
| Armstrong Departs on 20:49 - Jul 8 by EllDale | Oh, I didn’t know he was there! The Liverpool connection then. |
Not necessarily. I would imagine we touted his name around as available for transfer, Waterford possibly needed a player in that position and a deal was agreed. It’s probably as simple as that. |  |
| You mean you STILL haven't worked out why some posts get down-ticked? |
|  |
| Armstrong Departs on 08:02 - Jul 9 with 1292 views | judd | The bog? FFS |  |
|  |
| |