Today’s court case on 22:42 - Dec 22 with 2716 views | max936 |
Today’s court case on 17:54 - Dec 22 by Whiterockin | Anyone know the outcome of this case. Was it settled, adjourned or just a news blackout? |
Probably an out of court settlement and a signed gagging order. I just keeping hoping that all the truth will come out, don't think its gonna happen though. | ![](/images/avatars/9760.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 09:37 - Dec 23 with 2575 views | Whiterockin |
Today’s court case on 22:42 - Dec 22 by max936 | Probably an out of court settlement and a signed gagging order. I just keeping hoping that all the truth will come out, don't think its gonna happen though. |
The trust should have been informed through, as the club has been in court and they are 21% shareholders, shouldn't they? | ![](/images/avatars/9155.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 09:50 - Dec 23 with 2542 views | Private_Partz |
Today’s court case on 09:37 - Dec 23 by Whiterockin | The trust should have been informed through, as the club has been in court and they are 21% shareholders, shouldn't they? |
The worry for me is the Trust (or the inner cabal) have been informed. That Jenkins, realising he was on a sticky wicket, has shelled out to prevent further damage to his reputation becoming public. The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum. I have no proof of this whatsoever but their previous actions suggest this could indeed be a possibility....... | ![](/images/avatars/8905.gif) |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 09:52 - Dec 23 with 2539 views | Whiterockin |
Today’s court case on 09:50 - Dec 23 by Private_Partz | The worry for me is the Trust (or the inner cabal) have been informed. That Jenkins, realising he was on a sticky wicket, has shelled out to prevent further damage to his reputation becoming public. The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum. I have no proof of this whatsoever but their previous actions suggest this could indeed be a possibility....... |
"The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum". Building bridges or just enjoying the directors hospitality? | ![](/images/avatars/9155.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 11:06 - Dec 23 with 2458 views | Private_Partz |
Today’s court case on 09:52 - Dec 23 by Whiterockin | "The Trust hierarchy , hoping to continue building bridges, are keeping schtum". Building bridges or just enjoying the directors hospitality? |
I was being purposefully polite lol. Lisa and Clasey may get some insight in the future. Depends on if, or how much, the ranks are closed. | ![](/images/avatars/8905.gif) |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 15:27 - Jan 6 with 2303 views | Neath_Jack | What was the outcome of this? | ![](/images/avatars/9278.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 15:59 - Jan 6 with 2229 views | Whiterockin |
Today’s court case on 15:27 - Jan 6 by Neath_Jack | What was the outcome of this? |
I have been trying to get an update for weeks. Is there a total press blackout, has it been settled or is it adjourned if so until when. Surely the trust know as they are 21% shareholders of a business who are in court. | ![](/images/avatars/9155.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 16:01 - Jan 6 with 2222 views | Neath_Jack |
Today’s court case on 15:59 - Jan 6 by Whiterockin | I have been trying to get an update for weeks. Is there a total press blackout, has it been settled or is it adjourned if so until when. Surely the trust know as they are 21% shareholders of a business who are in court. |
Someone on here will definitely know. | ![](/images/avatars/9278.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) | Login to get fewer ads
Today’s court case on 16:02 - Jan 6 with 2216 views | Whiterockin |
Today’s court case on 16:01 - Jan 6 by Neath_Jack | Someone on here will definitely know. |
But will they tell us. | ![](/images/avatars/9155.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 17:23 - Jan 6 with 2109 views | AguycalledJack | If the trust board do know then surely they have a duty to report back to trust members on this? | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 17:25 - Jan 6 with 2096 views | exiledclaseboy |
Today’s court case on 17:23 - Jan 6 by AguycalledJack | If the trust board do know then surely they have a duty to report back to trust members on this? |
I have no idea what the outcome was or indeed if the case has concluded yet. Can’t speak for anyone else though. | ![](/images/avatars/8641.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 17:41 - Jan 6 with 2036 views | Uxbridge |
Today’s court case on 17:25 - Jan 6 by exiledclaseboy | I have no idea what the outcome was or indeed if the case has concluded yet. Can’t speak for anyone else though. |
Judgement is in the coming weeks, all I know. The Trust isn't going to have this earlier than the public though, and even if it did it can't publicise legal proceedings. | ![](/images/avatars/11019.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 17:44 - Jan 6 with 2017 views | AguycalledJack |
Today’s court case on 17:41 - Jan 6 by Uxbridge | Judgement is in the coming weeks, all I know. The Trust isn't going to have this earlier than the public though, and even if it did it can't publicise legal proceedings. |
No, but the trust can feedback on the outcome and what it means for the club. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 17:49 - Jan 6 with 1998 views | Uxbridge |
Today’s court case on 17:44 - Jan 6 by AguycalledJack | No, but the trust can feedback on the outcome and what it means for the club. |
That's an option. Depends on the judgement. Point was that the Trust isn't going to be able to preempt the conclusion though. | ![](/images/avatars/11019.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 17:58 - Jan 6 with 1961 views | AguycalledJack |
Today’s court case on 17:49 - Jan 6 by Uxbridge | That's an option. Depends on the judgement. Point was that the Trust isn't going to be able to preempt the conclusion though. |
As it shouldn’t. However a trust feedback or comment on the judgement would be appropriate given the Trust’s standing as a shareholder. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 18:14 - Jan 6 with 1930 views | Uxbridge |
Today’s court case on 17:58 - Jan 6 by AguycalledJack | As it shouldn’t. However a trust feedback or comment on the judgement would be appropriate given the Trust’s standing as a shareholder. |
I'd tend to agree. We'll see I guess, on both counts. [Post edited 6 Jan 2018 18:15]
| ![](/images/avatars/11019.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 18:29 - Jan 6 with 1883 views | PozuelosSideys | If a settlement is agreed out of court, chances are nothing will be allowed to be disclosed anyway | ![](/images/avatars/10793.gif) |
| "Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper." | Poll: | Hattricks |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 18:50 - Jan 6 with 1850 views | QJumpingJack | The fact that it has reached court level may suggest that the Americans and Huw J are confident of winning? | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 18:55 - Jan 6 with 1844 views | Whiterockin |
Today’s court case on 18:50 - Jan 6 by QJumpingJack | The fact that it has reached court level may suggest that the Americans and Huw J are confident of winning? |
I think what has come out in this court case has strengthened the trusts case if they went to court over the share sale. | ![](/images/avatars/9155.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 19:04 - Jan 6 with 1812 views | Swanzay |
Today’s court case on 18:50 - Jan 6 by QJumpingJack | The fact that it has reached court level may suggest that the Americans and Huw J are confident of winning? |
Opposite way around... | ![](/images/avatars/8787.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Today’s court case on 19:16 - Jan 6 with 1796 views | thornabyswan |
Today’s court case on 19:04 - Jan 6 by Swanzay | Opposite way around... |
I am a bit surprised the owners have done this are they confident of winning the case Can t see that myself. Do they have a buyer lined up and are they passing the problem on. It just doesn't make any sense but I smell a rat. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
| |