By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Mandy, someone is sounding out shareholders about selling their shares in RAFC and making false claims about the number of shares they have already bought. They are working for someone who runs a company called Blackbridge which has £181 in its last set of accounts and which apparently claims to help millionaires buy football clubs. Very wealthy people, in my experience, do not employ penniless 27 year old scousers to to help buy companies out for them. This is, in my opinion another chancer as per Halsall who had a leased Roller but no actual cash in any of his businesses. Maybe this latest clown to try his luck is part of the same scam. Would it be good to have a well-intentioned person with lots of money to spend on the board, probably yes, do we need an influx of Bottomley clones, chancers and people who know FA about RAFC and its fans? NO.
5
Sharehunters alert on 00:14 - Jul 3 with 4827 views
Easy isn't it James? I could create a corker implicating this mandy chap .
However, here is a REAL one:
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Simon Gauge <Simon.Gauge@rochdaleafc.co.uk> > Date: 24 June 2021 at 22:53:24 BST > To: Alexander Jarvis <ajarvis@blackbridgesports.com> > Subject: Call Tomorrow > >  > Hi Alex, > > I have been made aware by some shareholders that you have been making enquiries about purchasing their shares. > We have also had a complaint that data has been released to you from somebody within the club, a matter that we are now investigating. > There is also an accusation that the club’s view on any sale of shares has been misrepresented, again an accusation we are duty bound to investigate. > > Because of the above and having taken legal advice if you are intending to purchase any shares the board will not approve a share transfer until the above matter is fully investigated. We will endeavour to get this completed within 3 weeks. > > I will not be available for the scheduled call tomorrow > > Best regards > Simon
Touché Mandy love X Round here, our mate Chalky from Notts County gets told to FOOK OFF. Tonight, the honour is yours.
FOOK OFF.
"And only as far as Casey Pettit......"
8
Sharehunters alert on 00:14 - Jul 3 with 4824 views
From: Simon Gauge <Simon.Gauge@rochdaleafc.co.uk> Date: 24 June 2021 at 22:53:24 BST To: Alexander Jarvis <ajarvis@blackbridgesports.com> Subject: Call Tomorrow
 Hi Alex,
I have been made aware by some shareholders that you have been making enquiries about purchasing their shares. We have also had a complaint that data has been released to you from somebody within the club, a matter that we are now investigating. There is also an accusation that the club’s view on any sale of shares has been misrepresented, again an accusation we are duty bound to investigate.
Because of the above and having taken legal advice if you are intending to purchase any shares the board will not approve a share transfer until the above matter is fully investigated. We will endeavour to get this completed within 3 weeks.
I will not be available for the scheduled call tomorrow
It's appalling that the very future of the club is being touted about by ex Directors /CEO's to some fookin' charlatans who are trying to mop up shares on the cheap without putting a fookin' penny into the club.
100% shame on any shareholders who might consider selling out to these scum.
(Hi Mandy/DB)
Anyone trying to buy into my club will face one hell of a battle... and 100% moreso if they manage it on the sly. They have NO IDEA what they face,
5
Sharehunters alert on 00:33 - Jul 3 with 4685 views
I wonder if these folk have been targeting others with large shareholdings? If so, you’d like to think the legacy of those people would mean more than some quick cash. If not, we could end up with another Blackpool on our hands. No one wants that, do they?
Why don't you tell us their intentions? Come on lay your cards on the table and stop trying to ruin our club. Your parasites and IF you ever gain any control of our club I sure won't be stepping foot in the ground again as I expect many others will be of the same mindset.
So please kindly take your agenda and stick it up your rectum
[Post edited 3 Jul 2021 1:17]
2
Sharehunters alert on 08:43 - Jul 3 with 6123 views
The two people behind the two ex directors snaffling up shares are Andrew Curran and Darrell Rose. Both property developers which sets alarm bells ringing immediately.
0
Sharehunters alert on 08:45 - Jul 3 with 6125 views
If it is Alex Jarvis posting this email or sharing with it for an associate to post this email then I suspect he has breached an NDA, assuming David Bottomley put one in place.
The obvious defense the club will have is Simon Gauge's inbox. If our server shows it's gone from Simon Gauge to Alex Jarvis.
If it's gone nowhere else then Alex Jarvis is leakier than our back four when Balkenstein and Trotman were here!
George Bernard Shaw had it right:
"He who can does; he who cannot, teaches."
https://www.visittheusa.co.uk/
I have been following the thread but am I missing something here, the other thread seem to indicate that the club could have new owners by the end of the weekend, are we that close to a takeover?
0
Sharehunters alert on 10:43 - Jul 3 with 5730 views
Sharehunters alert on 10:15 - Jul 3 by seasidedale
I have been following the thread but am I missing something here, the other thread seem to indicate that the club could have new owners by the end of the weekend, are we that close to a takeover?
Yes. That close.
“It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooledâ€
0
Sharehunters alert on 16:20 - Jul 3 with 5311 views
All very worrying but whose shares does the grapevine say have been transferred? I get that Andrew Kelly's 53000 are important, both the number and his track record, but unless other major shareholders have sold out I don't see where the 40% would come from?
Sharehunters alert on 16:20 - Jul 3 by tony_roch975
All very worrying but whose shares does the grapevine say have been transferred? I get that Andrew Kelly's 53000 are important, both the number and his track record, but unless other major shareholders have sold out I don't see where the 40% would come from?
The balance of power currently lies with Kelly. If he sells his shares to the new bidders, they will have control.
“It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooledâ€
0
Sharehunters alert on 16:53 - Jul 3 with 5148 views
Sharehunters alert on 16:20 - Jul 3 by tony_roch975
All very worrying but whose shares does the grapevine say have been transferred? I get that Andrew Kelly's 53000 are important, both the number and his track record, but unless other major shareholders have sold out I don't see where the 40% would come from?
Andrew Kilpatrick 21.87% Andrew Kelly 11.58% North Yard Analytics Llc 7.42% Gergedan Llc 7.42% Graham Rawlinson 2.83% David Bottomley 2.6%
These are the most recent percentages I could find, so might not be perfect. This would total 53.72% if all share transfers were completed legally.
Andrew Kilpatrick 21.87% Andrew Kelly 11.58% North Yard Analytics Llc 7.42% Gergedan Llc 7.42% Graham Rawlinson 2.83% David Bottomley 2.6%
These are the most recent percentages I could find, so might not be perfect. This would total 53.72% if all share transfers were completed legally.
[Post edited 3 Jul 2021 17:00]
I get those would need to be the figures for a majority and most are reasonable assumptions but that requires Andrew Kilpatrick to have sold - are you saying he has?
Sharehunters alert on 16:59 - Jul 3 by tony_roch975
I get those would need to be the figures for a majority and most are reasonable assumptions but that requires Andrew Kilpatrick to have sold - are you saying he has?
Sharehunters alert on 16:59 - Jul 3 by tony_roch975
I get those would need to be the figures for a majority and most are reasonable assumptions but that requires Andrew Kilpatrick to have sold - are you saying he has?
That's what i was querying last night
How has it become evident that the shareholdings of those mentioned leave A Kelly with the balance of power?