| Russell Brand 15:09 - Nov 9 with 4005 views | union_jack | 10 yrs 6 mths (7 yrs inside). |  |
| |  |
| Russell Brand on 15:12 - Nov 9 with 0 views | onehunglow | He won’t see it out T About right Id say |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 15:58 - Nov 9 with 0 views | Wingstandwood | Now when it comes to narsssitic sociopathy and megalomania that's off the scale disturbing, imo there will never be another British celebrity like him. Fame went to his head and turned him into a monster. Bizarre to think at one stage he had it all, but lacked the self control and morality to be extremely happy (of which 99.9% would have been) with his lot. He had women throwing themselves at him, but despite that he acted in the depraved way that he did. |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 16:27 - Nov 9 with 0 views | union_jack |
| Russell Brand on 15:12 - Nov 9 by onehunglow | He won’t see it out T About right Id say |
You mean he’ll get early release or…?🥴 |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 16:58 - Nov 9 with 0 views | onehunglow |
| Russell Brand on 16:27 - Nov 9 by union_jack | You mean he’ll get early release or…?🥴 |
Think he will top himself or some gent does it for him |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 17:05 - Nov 9 with 0 views | Treforys_Jack | Horrible piece of work, wonder when they'll get around to all the other celebs and multi millionaires in the Epstein files, not to mention the grooming gangs. |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 17:08 - Nov 9 with 0 views | PawelAbbott | I don't know how it took so long, talking about it was his entire act. He wasn't funny he was a creep who talked about doing the things that have landed him in jail. |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 17:17 - Nov 9 with 0 views | Treforys_Jack |
| Russell Brand on 17:08 - Nov 9 by PawelAbbott | I don't know how it took so long, talking about it was his entire act. He wasn't funny he was a creep who talked about doing the things that have landed him in jail. |
Pure scum |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 18:15 - Nov 9 with 0 views | builthjack | Will serve 7 years. How did he get away with it for so long? There are others like him walking the streets too. |  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
|  | Login to get fewer ads
| Russell Brand on 18:37 - Nov 9 with 0 views | shingle |
| Russell Brand on 18:15 - Nov 9 by builthjack | Will serve 7 years. How did he get away with it for so long? There are others like him walking the streets too. |
Why does he get a right and proper sentence and is quite ruthlessly dealt with yet the powers that be drag there feet and seem reluctant to say the least when it comes to dealing with these Muslim offenders and with the Rape Gang offenders, if it were them and not Brand the case would probably have not even been dealt with yet and the sentences would probably be a lot less as well, is it a case of Brand being deemed more of a threat and not as valuble to the establishment. |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 19:25 - Nov 9 with 0 views | majorraglan |
| Russell Brand on 18:37 - Nov 9 by shingle | Why does he get a right and proper sentence and is quite ruthlessly dealt with yet the powers that be drag there feet and seem reluctant to say the least when it comes to dealing with these Muslim offenders and with the Rape Gang offenders, if it were them and not Brand the case would probably have not even been dealt with yet and the sentences would probably be a lot less as well, is it a case of Brand being deemed more of a threat and not as valuble to the establishment. |
The average time from charge to court completion for adult rape offences ranges from roughly 358 to 393 days, Brand was first charged in May 2025, so his case has taken 18 months which is longer than average. Multi defendant cases usually take a lot longer to come to trial because there are numerous solicitors, barristers etc involved, finding a suitable date when all the legal people are available, the court has a slot to hear the case, the prosecution can get the paperwork, the defence can review the evidence is much more difficult. There’s been a big cull in the number of Courts and Courts staff and the Criminal Justice system never recovered from the cuts it suffered between 2010 and 2022. In addition, to save money the governments of the day reduced the number of Crown Courts sitting days from around 130k to 85k so they didn’t have to pay the judges. |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 19:46 - Nov 9 with 0 views | KeithHaynes |
| Russell Brand on 18:15 - Nov 9 by builthjack | Will serve 7 years. How did he get away with it for so long? There are others like him walking the streets too. |
Victims didn’t come forward. Hence the long timeline between the offences and his sentencing. |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 19:52 - Nov 9 with 0 views | JJBomber | How long will Russell Brand get? About 8 inches when he bends over in the showers! |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 19:54 - Nov 9 with 0 views | KeithHaynes |
| Russell Brand on 18:37 - Nov 9 by shingle | Why does he get a right and proper sentence and is quite ruthlessly dealt with yet the powers that be drag there feet and seem reluctant to say the least when it comes to dealing with these Muslim offenders and with the Rape Gang offenders, if it were them and not Brand the case would probably have not even been dealt with yet and the sentences would probably be a lot less as well, is it a case of Brand being deemed more of a threat and not as valuble to the establishment. |
Judge stated he isn’t a threat at all in his summing up. It’s an appropriate sentence for charges of this nature. By comparison to other trials ? There never will be total fairness when it’s someone like Brand in the public eye. The judge did right, the sentencing is right but comparing it to other offenders regardless of religión or colour won’t rub. Total transparency in the law courts has never been a thing. |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 20:48 - Nov 9 with 0 views | builthjack |
| Russell Brand on 18:37 - Nov 9 by shingle | Why does he get a right and proper sentence and is quite ruthlessly dealt with yet the powers that be drag there feet and seem reluctant to say the least when it comes to dealing with these Muslim offenders and with the Rape Gang offenders, if it were them and not Brand the case would probably have not even been dealt with yet and the sentences would probably be a lot less as well, is it a case of Brand being deemed more of a threat and not as valuble to the establishment. |
If he had raped anybody close to me he would be in a box. So 7 years, he is lucky. |  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
|  |
| Russell Brand on 20:49 - Nov 9 with 0 views | JJBomber |
| Russell Brand on 19:54 - Nov 9 by KeithHaynes | Judge stated he isn’t a threat at all in his summing up. It’s an appropriate sentence for charges of this nature. By comparison to other trials ? There never will be total fairness when it’s someone like Brand in the public eye. The judge did right, the sentencing is right but comparing it to other offenders regardless of religión or colour won’t rub. Total transparency in the law courts has never been a thing. |
Indeed. How long did Huw Edwards get? |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 21:06 - Nov 9 with 0 views | majorraglan |
| Russell Brand on 20:49 - Nov 9 by JJBomber | Indeed. How long did Huw Edwards get? |
Huw Edwards wasn’t convicted of rape. |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 22:55 - Nov 9 with 0 views | jack_lord |
| Russell Brand on 19:54 - Nov 9 by KeithHaynes | Judge stated he isn’t a threat at all in his summing up. It’s an appropriate sentence for charges of this nature. By comparison to other trials ? There never will be total fairness when it’s someone like Brand in the public eye. The judge did right, the sentencing is right but comparing it to other offenders regardless of religión or colour won’t rub. Total transparency in the law courts has never been a thing. |
The judge was playing exactly to the laws and explaining his view on the witness statements and of the mitigation. I did have an issue with the possibility of the witness statements being one sided but that is a matter that sits with the judges discretion. How will his sentence be affected if more girls come forward |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 23:02 - Nov 9 with 0 views | onehunglow | Question we should ask is why so many see him As a victim and hardly treated We’re in deep doodoo |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 06:58 - Nov 10 with 0 views | Demitrius | With the documentary being aired on TV prior to the case can it be argued he didn't get a fair trial ? and the judge was leading the jury from the get go. Something about this seems "off" to me and he didn't help himself by painting a huge target on his back with his promiscuous memoirs. Did Icarus Brand fly too close to the sun I wonder? The scum that troll this site wanted him jailed purely because they didn't like him. That is not justice.. The body of evidence says he did things but.....I personally have misgivings about the trial Not here to win friends either |  |
| “Cunnilingus and Psychiatry brought us to this …” |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 09:49 - Nov 10 with 0 views | onehunglow |
| Russell Brand on 06:58 - Nov 10 by Demitrius | With the documentary being aired on TV prior to the case can it be argued he didn't get a fair trial ? and the judge was leading the jury from the get go. Something about this seems "off" to me and he didn't help himself by painting a huge target on his back with his promiscuous memoirs. Did Icarus Brand fly too close to the sun I wonder? The scum that troll this site wanted him jailed purely because they didn't like him. That is not justice.. The body of evidence says he did things but.....I personally have misgivings about the trial Not here to win friends either |
Should there be a limit Only Brand and his victims know the truth really as the barristers , judges and jury weren’t there From what they heard , the jury must have been very convinced given the sophistry of barristers [Post edited 10 Nov 10:05]
|  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 12:01 - Nov 10 with 0 views | Wingstandwood |
| Russell Brand on 06:58 - Nov 10 by Demitrius | With the documentary being aired on TV prior to the case can it be argued he didn't get a fair trial ? and the judge was leading the jury from the get go. Something about this seems "off" to me and he didn't help himself by painting a huge target on his back with his promiscuous memoirs. Did Icarus Brand fly too close to the sun I wonder? The scum that troll this site wanted him jailed purely because they didn't like him. That is not justice.. The body of evidence says he did things but.....I personally have misgivings about the trial Not here to win friends either |
This is a case that will always be open to doubt with a lot of people, because of the time lapse between the crimes and when he was charged and convicted. Also we live in a day and age where any doubt is further fueled by distrust, especially when new and modern terms like "lawfare"..."two-tier-policing"... "establishment stitch-up'...and "politicised judiciary" are viral and in the minds of many. I am happy with the verdict and do not tend to question the guilt of the accused, and do not question the police investigation, not unless a case is refereed to the CCRC because of new evidence that is proven to be extremely substantive and damning by showing a missacriage of justice. The trouble for the CCRC nowadays is it has to shift through blatant lies that are despicably used by some to try and get a guilty person released, that have been proven to be so. |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 12:11 - Nov 10 with 0 views | onehunglow |
| Russell Brand on 12:01 - Nov 10 by Wingstandwood | This is a case that will always be open to doubt with a lot of people, because of the time lapse between the crimes and when he was charged and convicted. Also we live in a day and age where any doubt is further fueled by distrust, especially when new and modern terms like "lawfare"..."two-tier-policing"... "establishment stitch-up'...and "politicised judiciary" are viral and in the minds of many. I am happy with the verdict and do not tend to question the guilt of the accused, and do not question the police investigation, not unless a case is refereed to the CCRC because of new evidence that is proven to be extremely substantive and damning by showing a missacriage of justice. The trouble for the CCRC nowadays is it has to shift through blatant lies that are despicably used by some to try and get a guilty person released, that have been proven to be so. |
Reactions can be seen to have political nuances Dem however makes his point well and its worth contemplation Should there be time limits for prosecutions ? It’s a poisonous topic |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 12:23 - Nov 10 with 0 views | JJBomber |
| Russell Brand on 06:58 - Nov 10 by Demitrius | With the documentary being aired on TV prior to the case can it be argued he didn't get a fair trial ? and the judge was leading the jury from the get go. Something about this seems "off" to me and he didn't help himself by painting a huge target on his back with his promiscuous memoirs. Did Icarus Brand fly too close to the sun I wonder? The scum that troll this site wanted him jailed purely because they didn't like him. That is not justice.. The body of evidence says he did things but.....I personally have misgivings about the trial Not here to win friends either |
The scum that troll this site weren't on the jury, so it's irrelevant. The decision was unanimous for the rape and 3 counts of sexual assault. He was cleared of all the other charges, so it can hardly be a stitch up. I wasn't at the trial, so I have no idea if the judge was leading the jury. |  | |  |
| Russell Brand on 13:41 - Nov 10 with 0 views | Wingstandwood |
| Russell Brand on 12:11 - Nov 10 by onehunglow | Reactions can be seen to have political nuances Dem however makes his point well and its worth contemplation Should there be time limits for prosecutions ? It’s a poisonous topic |
We have had a very notorious case down this part of the world! For example on that particular subject matter, the CCRC went through police interview material and would have noted that a participant in one (there have been a few) of the CCRC appeals campaigns/documents, was now many years latter completely contradicting herself when it came to what she had actually said in previous police interview(s). This was evident on numerous occasions. WRITTEN IN STONE! To add to that, the CCRC would have also noted (not on Google search) and gone through Crown Court trial transcripts with stuff that was not even reported and thus unavailable to the general public. WRITTEN IN STONE! The judge’s comments about the aforementioned person were memorable to those that heard them to say the least. His words went along the lines of "we've got a right one here", thankfully the jury agreed! But saying that i.e. people's distrust and verdict questioning is neither evil, nor is it out of the ordinary or isolated to just one particular case especially during these current times! This list is nigh infinitive. And of course people have lied in the past which indeed fuels peoples distrust and questioning of verdicts! |  |
|  |
| Russell Brand on 13:47 - Nov 10 with 0 views | Demitrius |
| Russell Brand on 12:23 - Nov 10 by JJBomber | The scum that troll this site weren't on the jury, so it's irrelevant. The decision was unanimous for the rape and 3 counts of sexual assault. He was cleared of all the other charges, so it can hardly be a stitch up. I wasn't at the trial, so I have no idea if the judge was leading the jury. |
The likeliest situation is he's guilty of a drunken/drug related sexual assault and rape. The man is/was a polecat. Is it normal and custom and practice though for the top cop to come out and encourage others to come forward and press charges with 6 figure sums in compensation bandied about. That's going to only result in a stampede. When you compare this case to numerous others involving sexual offences it does smack very much that they want him hammered and never to see the light of day again. This case and the way it's been brought about doesn't sit fully right with me... Maybe someone should have given him a leaflet...? |  |
| “Cunnilingus and Psychiatry brought us to this …” |
|  |
| |