| David Walliams 12:44 - Nov 10 with 1222 views | union_jack |
And here we go again!
Worst kept secret mind you🙄 |  |
| |  |
| David Walliams on 13:31 - Nov 10 with 0 views | onehunglow |
Hmm
Dam seems to be bursting [Post edited 10 Nov 13:32]
|  |
| |
| David Walliams on 14:10 - Nov 10 with 0 views | Boundy |
Pity the media have deemed the rape of young girls by others not deemed as famous not important enough, but give them a "celebrity " they're all over it like a rash . | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| David Walliams on 15:38 - Nov 10 with 0 views | Wingstandwood |
Ahhhh another with a God complex by being drunk on his own fame! Whether allegations are true or not he comes across as yet another horrid celeb,
QUOTE: "I wrote that he was one of the rudest celebrities I had ever interviewed." What is it about some of these stars in the way they treat people like dirt?
https://www.express.co.uk/cele |  |
| |
| David Walliams on 17:01 - Nov 10 with 0 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
An issue for Walliams is whether or not he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the alleged defences .
When asked in court specific legal questions of consent he cannot say "I cannot remember". His defence will argue the accuser was in the e same state and it was a few years back. Witnesses are critical. . |  |
| |
| David Walliams on 18:08 - Nov 10 with 0 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| David Walliams on 17:01 - Nov 10 by ReslovenSwan1 |
An issue for Walliams is whether or not he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the alleged defences .
When asked in court specific legal questions of consent he cannot say "I cannot remember". His defence will argue the accuser was in the e same state and it was a few years back. Witnesses are critical. . |
One of the allegations involve a two year period where he allegedly groomed a 15 year old up until she was 17 when he slept with/assaulted her. If these allegations are true it’s very unlikely he was so drunk for the whole two years he “cannot remember” any of it. It was (according to reports) a sustained and lengthy process, a targeted attack if you will. |  |
| |
| David Walliams on 22:55 - Nov 10 with 0 views | JJBomber |
| David Walliams on 18:08 - Nov 10 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
One of the allegations involve a two year period where he allegedly groomed a 15 year old up until she was 17 when he slept with/assaulted her. If these allegations are true it’s very unlikely he was so drunk for the whole two years he “cannot remember” any of it. It was (according to reports) a sustained and lengthy process, a targeted attack if you will. |
It's important to note that these are only allegations at the moment. There hasn't been a police investigation nor any charges made. The court case was under Article 8 of the ECHR, where anyone (paedophiles and sex offenders) have a right to privacy. It doesn't matter what the evidence is, they can file a claim under Article 8. We can only wonder how many more sex offenders and, indeed, terrorists are hiding behind these rulings. | | | |
| David Walliams on 08:03 - Nov 11 with 0 views | SullutaCreturned |
| David Walliams on 22:55 - Nov 10 by JJBomber |
It's important to note that these are only allegations at the moment. There hasn't been a police investigation nor any charges made. The court case was under Article 8 of the ECHR, where anyone (paedophiles and sex offenders) have a right to privacy. It doesn't matter what the evidence is, they can file a claim under Article 8. We can only wonder how many more sex offenders and, indeed, terrorists are hiding behind these rulings. |
He tried to use article 8 to prevent his name being published, alongside Articles 2 and 3, arguing that publication would damage his relationship with his teenage son and severely impact his mental health.
The court decided that article 10, the media's right to freedom of expression over ruled that claim.
Article 8 is a safeguard, not a guarantee, a court will decided, on balance, what to do. | | | |
| David Walliams on 09:44 - Nov 11 with 0 views | onehunglow |
Just as well he can afford a legal “ team”
Fill your boots boys | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| David Walliams on 14:34 - Nov 11 with 0 views | 1983 |
Jonathan Ross quick to distance himself from Walliams & Brand like rats on a sinking ship, once the dust settles I wonder if Brand starts calling other celebs out??🍿 |  |
| |
| David Walliams on 16:29 - Nov 11 with 0 views | Whiterockin |
| David Walliams on 14:34 - Nov 11 by 1983 |
Jonathan Ross quick to distance himself from Walliams & Brand like rats on a sinking ship, once the dust settles I wonder if Brand starts calling other celebs out??🍿 |
Squeaky bum time? |  | | |
| David Walliams on 16:39 - Nov 11 with 0 views | KeithHaynes |
People posting pictures of Gervais with Walliams as if Ricky knew, Twitter is a cesspit as we have experienced recently. |  |
| |
| David Walliams on 18:57 - Nov 11 with 0 views | max936 |
| David Walliams on 16:39 - Nov 11 by KeithHaynes |
People posting pictures of Gervais with Walliams as if Ricky knew, Twitter is a cesspit as we have experienced recently. |
I've always been of the opinion that its a cesspit and a dangerous one at that in my opinion of course.
I'll never sign up to it, no interest at all for the reason above. |  | | |
| David Walliams on 19:38 - Nov 11 with 0 views | Luther27 |
| David Walliams on 14:34 - Nov 11 by 1983 |
Jonathan Ross quick to distance himself from Walliams & Brand like rats on a sinking ship, once the dust settles I wonder if Brand starts calling other celebs out??🍿 |
Labour front bench sitters are pretty quiet about this. | | | |
| David Walliams on 01:55 - Nov 12 with 0 views | Robbie |
| David Walliams on 19:38 - Nov 11 by Luther27 |
Labour front bench sitters are pretty quiet about this. |
A menber of The Cabinets PR team are now working overtime to appease this oversight and reflect on the errors of that interview .
In another life I could well have been a high profile lawyer spinning yarns though .
Took a wrong direction somewhere though , but can gladly understand BS even now .
[Post edited 12 Nov 2:02]
| | | |
| David Walliams on 09:17 - Nov 12 with 0 views | onehunglow |
| David Walliams on 01:55 - Nov 12 by Robbie |
A menber of The Cabinets PR team are now working overtime to appease this oversight and reflect on the errors of that interview .
In another life I could well have been a high profile lawyer spinning yarns though .
Took a wrong direction somewhere though , but can gladly understand BS even now .
[Post edited 12 Nov 2:02]
|
Lawyers!
Spinning yarns?
As if
They are only seeing the truth
That was said on here | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.